Skip to content
A patient-specific 3D-printed titanium implant on a sterile tray
Medical Devices & Equipment

Patient-Specific 3D-Printed Implants

Mapping the printer-material stacks, QA tools, and regulatory strategies to enable CE- and FDA-cleared patient-specific titanium implants for complex orthopaedic reconstruction.

Client

UK Orthopaedic Firm

Objective

Enable Cleared Patient-Specific Implants

Timeline

10-Week Program

Key Focus

Reproducibility & Sterilisation

The Challenge: From Digital Twin to Sterile Implant

While 3D printing can perfectly replicate a patient's anatomy, three intertwined barriers keep these "digital-twin" implants from routine clinical use: ensuring consistent mechanical properties, validating sterility for porous structures, and navigating the complex regulatory pathways for software-defined medical devices.

Reproducible Properties: Pore size, strut thickness, and build orientation can alter yield strength by over 30%, making lot-to-lot consistency a major QA hurdle.
Terminal Sterilisation: Porous lattices can trap endotoxins, while common sterilisation methods like steam can warp the precision parts.
Regulatory Pathways: CAD workflows that auto-generate implant designs are classified as Software as a Medical Device (SaMD), requiring rigorous validation of both the code and the printed output.

Key Outcome: A Validated, Cost-Effective Production Stack

Our analysis ranked five end-to-end production pathways. The top-ranked solution met all mechanical, sterility, SaMD, and cost targets, providing a clear path to commercialisation.

Top-Ranked Solution: LPBF + In-Process AI + Low-Temp X-Ray

118 MPa

Compressive Yield (±7%)

<12 EU

Endotoxin Level

IEC 62304

SaMD Class B Compliant

~£2,900

All-In Cost Per Implant

Strategic Impact

Based on our findings, the client is proceeding with a 50-implant pilot across two UK trauma centres. A clear regulatory path has been defined, including an FDA Breakthrough Device request.

Successful validation will establish a robust pathway for patient-specific implants, unlocking new revenue streams and saving an estimated 2 hours of operating room time per procedure.