Skip to content
Abstract visualization of an AI analyzing ECG data streams
Medical Devices & Equipment

AI-Based Cardiac Monitoring

Identifying algorithm pipelines and security architectures for an FDA- and CE-cleared cloud ECG analytics service that is scalable, secure, and equitable.

Client

Diagnostics-as-a-Service Startup

Objective

Deliver Secure & Equitable AI Analytics

Timeline

10-Week Program

Key Focus

Bias Mitigation & Liability

The Challenge: Three Hurdles to Trustworthy AI in Cardiology

Cloud-hosted AI promises faster, cheaper arrhythmia detection. But its adoption is constrained by critical issues of algorithmic bias, legal liability, and data security.

Training-Data Bias

Public ECG corpora skew toward middle-aged white males, leading to algorithms that "under-see" arrhythmias in women and minority patients, jeopardizing equity and regulatory clearance.

Liability for False Negatives

A missed critical event can have fatal consequences. Responsibility between the AI vendor, physician, and device maker remains a murky legal area in many jurisdictions.

End-to-End Security & Privacy

Streaming raw ECG data to the cloud invokes strict HIPAA and GDPR rules. Encryption, zero-trust access, and full audit trails are mandatory but add cost and latency.

Key Outcome: A Bias-Audited, Secure, & Performant Solution

Our analysis identified a top-performing solution that met every target for clinical performance, equity, security, and cost, providing a clear path to market.

Top-Ranked Solution: Transformer-CNN Hybrid + Re-weighted Focal Loss

96.8%

AFib Sensitivity

98.5%

AFib Specificity

3.1%

Bias Gap Across Demographics

210 ms

Latency via Edge-GPU

Strategic Impact: A Clear Three-Pillar Go-to-Market Plan

The findings provided the client with a comprehensive framework for a successful, compliant launch of the first bias-audited, GDPR-secure AI ECG cloud service.

Pilot Plan

A 300-patient prospective study across the UK & Germany, with edge-GPU nodes hosted in NHS-approved data centres.

Regulatory Path

A clear strategy for an FDA 510(k) de novo and CE MDR Annex IX dossier, with identified predicate devices.

Liability Framework

An ISO 14971 risk file complemented by a £2M per-claim cyber-malpractice rider shared between the vendor and hospital.